Dr. Phil is a trainwreck
2005/12/29
@ 11:22 PM (31 months, 21 days ago)
Millardo the Retardo throws down the gauntlet and then won't let anyone
answer her. She is the one who will not answer the questions about how
she feels about abortions. Though asked several times to expound on her
views she refuses. She is okay with abortions on demand, yet she
criticizes someone she won't even let answer her. Her idea of a culture
of life is to kill every unwanted, unborn child and save the terrorists
some embarrassment. Want to know what's really embarrassing?
1. That she calls herself an American
2. She never took a speech and debate course
3. She wouldn't support the Troops unless it's to serve as Bin Laden's Josef Goebbels
4. She is a pro-death advocate
Since 1973 there has been over 13 million Black children killed and
their precious mothers victimized by the U.S. abortion industry.
In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King said, "The early church brought an end to such things as INFANTICIDE." What would Martin Luther King say to the church today?
No one on the right that I know of that is pro-life would advocate the
bombing of an abortion clinic. Her argument is a straw man since no one
who she has challenged has ever said it was okay to bomb a clinic.
Commenters to her blog have asked her on numerous occasions to explain
her view and she refuses. If you are interested Ms. Retardo we do
support and help women find alternatives to abortions, we do adopt
unwanted children. What do you do? You support a party that supports
the abortion industry by legislating abortion on demand and refusing to
give parents the right to know if their child is getting an abortion.
Don't even try it Millard, you're being lectured to, not giving the
lectures. Just look at how many comments you get. So tell us Shalana
since you have said you are not for abortions on demand please
enlighten us for once. Which ones are you against?
Here's some pictures of what your sick twisted ideology supports
Look at it hard Shalana, you make me sick!
Culture of Life - Take 2
Let's give it up for the so-called "culture of life" neo-cons on the
far right. They are for a culture of life, so much so that
they threw a firebomb at an abortion clinic in Shreveport,
Louisiana.
Brian Crawford, Spokesman for the Shreveport Fire
Department, said "This is not a crime to be taken lightly.
It's an arson crime -- and because of the nature of this crime, someone
could also be charged with domestic terrorism as well."
A
note to our friends on the right: if you really want to promote a
culture of life, and if you are so concerned with abortions, when is
the last time you walked up to a woman going into an abortion clinic,
and askd her to see the birth through, so you can adopt her unborn
child.
Firebomb thrown at abortion clinic
@ 08:47 PM (31 months, 21 days ago)
At first I couldn't figure out why
Millard was against this and then it dawned on me. The Dems need the
illegals and the dead people's vote if they are gonna have a chance to
take back the White House. I mean so what if you're not even a citizen,
you should not be disenfranchised.
African-American lawmakers in Georgia are vowing to repeal the new
Voter ID law, which is essentially a state-sanctioned poll tax. (so it's a bad thing to want to make sure you are allowed to vote? What if it was free would Millard be for it then? I doubt it!)
Under the new law, Georiga voters who do not have a driver's
license, will be required to purchase a state-issued identification
card, which could cost approximately $35.
State Rep. Alisha Morgan said "It's whatever it takes. (She must be a Dem) I'm putting
on the armor.(Is that the armor Kerry voted for?) Nothing they can do will fix the bill. It's a bad law and
it needs to be repealed. We're not going backwards." (Well you are certainly well on your way to a fraudulent election then)
The U.S. Justice Department approved the law in August, but in
November, a memo revealed that career lawyers and analysts in the
Department had opposed the Georgia law. They were overruled by the
politicos in DOJ, however.
In October, a federal judge blocked Georgia from enforcing the law,
saying it essentially amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax. (So make it free and there is no problem, right?)
@ 05:04 PM (31 months, 22 days ago)

Recently, scientists found that Millardo IS in fact the missing link...
@ 05:04 PM (31 months, 22 days ago)

Recently, scientists found that Millardo IS in fact the missing link...
@ 09:51 AM (31 months, 22 days ago)
On Wednesday, Moore suddenly appeared at an abortion clinic in Kalmazoo Michigan and yanked bloghi.com's own lastwordmillard off the table while the dominatrix was being prepped for an abortion. "Don't do it woman", said Moore. "I will personally raise the skunk/donkey child after it's birth."


Moore went on to say that he almost given up the search for a woman with both a bigger mouth and a bigger butt than his. "I have found my soulmate, I hope she will have me."
Meanwhile, the mother was believe it or not slill pecking out the latest blogcrap on a blackberry she had started while on the table. "Email me those sentiments fatty and I will get back to you", said millardo.
2005/12/28
@ 03:07 AM (31 months, 23 days ago)
We all know Millard could care less
about the babies. (See previous posts where it's okay to kill babies by
abortion...oh but don't torture the terrorists). So this post from the
27th is no surprise. She doesn't care about this family, this is her
back handed slap at the US fighting man and by extension GWB. She
supports the troops all right. With support like this who needs the
enemy. 2005/12/27
@ 11:29 PM (3 hours, 34 minutes ago)
WJLA
TV is running a heartbreaking AP story about 6 year old Eissa, an Iraqi
who was killed by U.S. fire as he prepared to travel to Syria with his
father. Eissa's mother, Jameela, says says she does not know what
U.S. forces were firing at when they killed her little boy.
(Note to Idiot Son, Rummy, Condi, and all the other neo-con "architechts" of the war: this is winning hearts and minds how?)
Violence Defies Reason for Many in Iraq
@ 02:43 AM (31 months, 23 days ago)
Several must-reads today:
1. Hmmm..now we know why Idiot Blogger
really started blogging. During her stint in the Clinton
Administration, Shalana said U.S. Government employees should be immune
from any comments made by people who make sense. (Read: the woman who
wants to be taken seriously, thinks it's ok to cuss people out and
malign them), and rather than resort to decent discussions (a sure way
to get visitors) she takes all day just to come up with "typical"
"repugnut" and "intellectually lazy" .
Shalana can't be taken seriously because she sounds like a banshee
2.
The Washington Compost takes a look at the blog wars inside the
blogosphere, and it's apparent (Progressive Minds) is on the losing
side.
<>
Democrats can't
win at the ballot box or
in the arena of ideas so
they have resorted to using shills like
Shalana.
2005/12/27
@ 11:00 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
In search of new scurilous drivel, the blogskunk takes to the open road 
Troopers in 7 states went in the opposite direction when "this" passed them exceeding the speed limit and promptly puked right in their cruisers
@ 10:52 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
Guess who was sitting in the middle?
You got it!..The blog world's favorite skunk of course!
@ 08:49 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
After spending years in seclusion when he was dumped by Starr Jones, Knight is now out in public and is even dating. The latest lucky lady dating this man

is our own millardoretardo....apparently as a result of what is depicted in a post appearing below and constant eating, she has become Knight's type.
@ 08:45 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
Hey you,

....yeah that's right YOU millardo....apparently not all conservative bloggers received the Harry and David Christmas Fruit basket from you. You will be hearing from the ACLU
@ 07:07 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
With the shocking indictment of Mizz Millard, the FBI has issued an APB for her whereabouts. Millard allegedly committed a brutal murder and is currently at large and is considered armed and dangerous. The FBI asks that you not approach her, but rather call their tip line immediately with any information.
The shocking crime scene photo follows; beware, it is a horrific image.

@ 06:59 PM (31 months, 23 days ago)
The real reason Millard hates Prs. Bush: he insulted her hero.

2005/12/24
@ 11:57 PM (31 months, 26 days ago)
Yet another reason for Millard to start DEPORTING illegals at her job at the INS, rather than mollycoddling them with loser social programs!

@ 11:53 PM (31 months, 26 days ago)
Behold, the Millard family 'Christmas' tree...

2005/12/22
@ 03:08 PM (31 months, 29 days ago)
I need a gift subscription for Millard, too.

@ 03:05 PM (31 months, 29 days ago)
Move over, Michael, and make room for AlwayslastwordMillard!

2005/12/20
@ 10:41 PM (32 months, 19 hours ago)
More 'illeagal' spy footage of alwayslastwordmillard at her computer, this time furiously trying to block all comments from her so-called blog.

@ 09:55 PM (32 months, 20 hours ago)
Kerry and Edwards came as themselves and lastwordmillard showed up wearing only a Hillary Clinton head as a costume. They ended up having a three way that Janet Reno caught with her Polaroid. A copy of the photo was found amidst Reno's girl on girl porno collection when FBI investigators tossed the place looking for additional Democratic fundraising violations.

@ 09:33 PM (32 months, 20 hours ago)
Joining her equally clueless political pals, the mystery woman turns out to be none other than lastwordmillard:

2005/12/19
@ 10:01 PM (32 months, 1 day ago)
Rogue blogger finds the right place to look for fellow travelers

@ 09:47 PM (32 months, 1 day ago)
The Neilsens are now getting back data from a huge random sample of blog watchers. Naturally at the top of the list in terms of popularity are blogs which voice support for the soldiers in Iraq. Scrapbooking blogs in general get double the traffic of blogs dealing with the DNC. Placing last immediately below blogs dealing with hemorroid treatments was the blog of lastwordmillard.
@ 09:38 PM (32 months, 1 day ago)
lastwordmillard shown in the foreground with a fistful of contingent fee agreements looking for relatives of victims of plane crash:

@ 08:57 PM (32 months, 1 day ago)
Due to the wiretaps authorized by President Bush, we here at Regressive Minds were able to tap into Millard's webcam...

@ 08:53 PM (32 months, 1 day ago)
Despondent over her failure of a so-called blog, Millard decides to end it all...

2005/12/18
@ 09:53 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
It might be revealing to see who is viewed by who is viewed as a milf. Any potential milf's may considered and discussed. Let's throw out a name: Ms. Millard...milf or not?
I bet she probably is one!
Respectfully submitted, Barry
@ 09:40 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
Hey, Millard. You, madame, are a coward who is afraid of anyone else who is more articulate than you. If you were the free thinking person you claim to be, you could engage in a little civil discourse. I won't hold my breath, though.
If you want to say something to this site and others, have the stones to sign in and post comments. Don't worry; we won't ban you from commenting, no matter how vulgar you become.
@ 09:36 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
It seems from her recent comments on conservative and right thinking sites that Millard is spiraling out of control.
Turdblossom?
Whatever, Bevis.
@ 09:24 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
We here at Regressive Minds have consulted a lawyer, and due to the inane and possibly brain damaging content of Millard's blog, they have advised us that we may sue her if she does not post a disclaimer prior to entering. We have done her the service of creating one on her behalf, and strongly encourage her to immediately implement it.

@ 09:20 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
Millard has recently banned anyone whose opinion differs from her own from commenting on her so-called blog. This includes specific registered users and all anonymous commentors. Free speech is only OK when it concurs with your own skewed point of view, huh Millard?
Hey, we may not be able to discuss the issues in an open fashion, but at least the trains run on time...

@ 09:14 PM (32 months, 2 days ago)
Millard is revealed to be the insane criminal, the Joker!

2005/12/16
@ 11:11 PM (32 months, 4 days ago)
With her blog and government job fading into the sunset, there is one way out for lastwordmillard

@ 10:53 PM (32 months, 4 days ago)
The latest lunacy is that lastwordmillard has blocked comments from anyone who not a registered bloghi user and has also blocked most registered bloghi users....huh? HEIL HITLER!!!!

Blogging live, from somewhere in the reality-based community. Speaking truth to power. You've entered the real "no spin zone." Republicans beware!
Important MessageYou are not registered with blogHi!, and the author of this Blog disallows anonymous comments.
@ 09:43 PM (32 months, 4 days ago)
I recently ran across this lastwordmillard bio:
A Fish With a Really Big Mouth
by Brice Semmens, REEF Web Guy
The other day I started thinking, "what was the most exciting fish sighting I have ever had?"
Snakefish (Trachinocephalus myops). Why is this so exciting? Because I never in a million years thought I would see this fish in my lifetime. And when I saw this rare fish, quite frankly, I couldn't believe my eyes. I have actually seen it twice, on two separate trips to Bonaire. Both of the sightings occurred while I was on a dive on or around the Town Pier dive site. As far as dive sites go on Boniare, I would call Town Pier "trashy", with huge tractor tires and other strange things that have dropped over the side of various boats mooring at the pier over the years. However, the Town Pier is also probably my favorite dive site on Bonaire, because you never know what you might find. The number of eels that make the tires around the pier home is simply astonishing.
Anyway, back to the snakefish. So, I was exploring around the pier on a dusk dive with a REEF Field Survey group. Along with me was Jerry Ligon, the naturalist for the Sand Dollar Beach Resort, and one of REEF's most experienced and knowledgeable volunteers, Ken Deaver. We had drifted away from the pier about mid-dive and had moved out over a sandy/silty substrate, where the visibility was noticeably lower. Personally, I was looking for razorfish, and had come across several sand divers (Synodus intermedius) when I noticed another that looked… just a bit off. I followed it a bit further, watching it as it swam just ahead of me, always keeping its back to me. Then, it seems to get a bit more comfortable with having people around, and it settled down on the sand in front of me. Both Jerry and Ken had noticed it as well, and we began to position ourselves to get a closer look. What I saw was indeed quite strange: a thick powerful lizardfish , more tubular in appearance than the sand diver. The markings on the side were different too… not much, but enough to catch the eye. And then, as I made my way around to the front of the fish, I saw the head and mouth of this fish… WHAT A MOUTH! That's when it clicked that I was looking at the snakefish. I had to reach back into the depths of my mind to drag up the image of the fish from the ID book. I could distinctly remember skimming over the image of the snakefish in the book and thinking to myself that I would never see the fish, and need not remember its name or what it looks like. The head does certainly look like that of a snake.

@ 09:36 PM (32 months, 4 days ago)
Bill O'Reilly's fact checkers have done it again. It turns out the lastwordmillard is actually a bagger/shopping car collector at a Winn Dixie.

@ 07:16 AM (32 months, 5 days ago)
The skunk is losing control. Reports are in that she is having trouble keeping up with both erasures, lying nasy rebuttals and the posting of false spurious information. millard's life is spinning out of control as the problem grows.

2005/12/15
@ 08:55 AM (32 months, 6 days ago)
2005/12/14
@ 12:24 PM (32 months, 7 days ago)

Regressive Minds has managed to obtain a high school yearbook photo of Millard. You guessed it, she's a weasel!
@ 12:21 PM (32 months, 7 days ago)

Really, no one wants to see that!
P.S. You can go here to make Millard perform menial tasks...
http://www.subservientchicken.com/
2005/12/13
@ 08:46 PM (32 months, 7 days ago)
millard's latest blunder is calling c-mom a racist bitch in the millard blog. go to conservative-mommy.bloghi.com
2005/12/12
@ 10:00 PM (32 months, 8 days ago)
| Lab Mice Grow Human Brain Cells After Injections |
|
Monday, December 12, 2005
SAN FRANCISCO — Add another creation to the strange scientific menagerie where animal species are being mixed together in ever more exotic combinations. |
@ 09:49 PM (32 months, 8 days ago)
One Sunni militant group in Ramadi was handing out leaflets addressed to al Qaeda saying if you attack the voters, you'll have to deal with us.
But Shiites didn't hesitate to show their strength in numbers,
CBS News correspondent Lara Logan reports. The streets of Sadr City, a slum where Shiites were terrorized by Saddam Hussein,
thousands of Iraqis waved flags and shouted chants (video) of "Yes, yes to Islam," to voice what they want their government to look like after Thursday's election.
@ 09:05 PM (32 months, 8 days ago)
"It is not What You Train Your Dog,
But How You Do it that Matter"
Save Thousands of Dollars Spend on Professional Trainers that don't really know
what they are doing and Spare Your Dog from all the unwanted Stress
How would you like to solve Your Dog Behavior Problem in Less than a Week and Save Thousands of Dollars on Professional Dog Trainers Fees? |
@ 08:56 PM (32 months, 8 days ago)

Hussein begged for mercy from the guards, "Please, anything but this. I will tell you where the truckloads of money are. I will tell you all of Iran's nuclear secrets. I will rat out Bin Laden. BUT FOR ALLAH'S SAKE DON'T MAKE ME GO IN THERE. It's a violation of the Geneva Convention and Ramsay Clark won't like it."
@ 01:28 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
The New York Times reported this Sunday that conservative blogs are more effective than their liberal counterparts. More proof, Millard, that while you are free to express your opinions, you are really just wasting bandwidth.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47843
@ 11:35 AM (32 months, 9 days ago)

Millard can be seen here at her new job as a CNN news correspondent. No doubt, it was due to Affirmative Action.
@ 11:24 AM (32 months, 9 days ago)

Sadly, we must report another victim was pulled from Millard's trash early this morning. Millard has refused to comment.
@ 11:19 AM (32 months, 9 days ago)
So you're saying we should just forget about the people of New Orleans? Say, "Screw you, you're on your own?"
The fact is, we don't have to. I was discussing the President's generous and caring nature with a survivor of New Orleans/ Hurricane Katrina on another message board. He wanted me to pass a message on to you.
"Tell the American people that there IS a difference between Democrats/Progressives and Republicans. Tell them that those dems are nothing but selfish bastards; its all about me, me, me. Republicans know that we don't live in this world alone, and we have an obligation to our fellow man. The fact is that even though New Orleans WAS built, we who used to live there don't expect the rest of the country to put themselves out rebuilding a lost cause. Tell Millard that even though we had a lifetime of memories there, that facts are facts and Katrina DID wipe out Mardi Gras, jazz and the French Quarter. Tell Millard and her 'progressive' cronies that we will rebuild and we should rebuild, but not in a place that is below sea level. We can rebuild our memories in a safe place, a place where we don't have to worry every year. Why would the dems want that for us and our children? I'm sick of people telling me to rebuild my city and wait for the next chance that it may die!"
2005/12/11
@ 10:54 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)

"take that bitch"
@ 10:13 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 10:01 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 10:00 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 10:00 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 09:59 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 09:57 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
@ 09:55 PM (32 months, 9 days ago)
Facing some unwanted attention? We canvassed single people like you — and dating experts — for their strategies on how to dodge those advances. Plus: 3 signs someone is trying to give you the slip.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Whose relationship history includes... |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
So you're at a bar or party and someone has taken a shine to you. Unfortunately, the feeling isn't mutual and you want to quickly end the exchange. What to do? Sometimes the truth (“I'm not interested”) is too harsh. Listen in as experts share their advice... and as single people like you reveal the more original ways they've given people the slip when conventional methods don't work. (Caution: Some of these earn points for creativity, not kindness.)
4 expert-approved ways to avoid someone
Our panel of expert advisors suggest the following:
- Bring things to a quick close. Wait for a tiny break in the banter and then say, "Well, it's been fun chatting. Please excuse me but I think I see my friend. Have a great night." Then walk off purposefully to another area out of view. Yes, it's abrupt, but it gets you out of there. You really don't need an elaborate excuse.
- Introduce him or her to a friend or an acquaintance—then quickly slip away. Granted, it may seem underhanded to pawn off your unwanted goods onto a pal, but who knows? You know the saying: One person's blow-off, another's budding relationship...
- Say you have a boyfriend or girlfriend. It's the oldest trick in the book, but there's a reason it's withstood the test of time: It's totally plausible and therefore lets your suitor down easy. Worried that news of your phantom squeeze will deter someone you have your eye on? Don't worry, news rarely travels that quickly. And even if it does, anyone you flirt up a storm with will take it with a grain of salt.
- Grab your cell phone and say, "I totally forgot, I was supposed to call a friend of mine and tell her where the bar/club/party is. Can you excuse me for a sec?" Then you can just drift away and begin circulating again in a minute or so.
How other singles give people the slip
We're not saying you should try these moves exactly, but they sure do win points for originality...
The undercover cop excuse
"This girl kept hitting on me at a club one time. I wasn't interested in her, but I didn't want to be rude. So, I told her I was an undercover cop, and that I had to concentrate on looking for people breaking the law. When she asked to see my badge, I told her that I didn't want to blow my cover. She persisted, so I told her that if she didn't leave me alone, I'd have to cite her for obstruction of justice. It worked, and she high-tailed it outta there." —John South
One sick scheme
"One time I was at a bar and a girl wouldn't leave me alone. To drive her away, I told her that I had mono, and that she might catch it. She'd been hitting on me all night, but that was enough to get her to stop. I wound up trying to talk to another girl at the bar who asked me, 'Aren't you the guy who has mono?' Turns out the first girl had spilled the beans about my excuse to some other girls. Serves me right, I guess." —Chris LaFleur
Touchdown!
"Two of my friends had to run interference for me at a party when this girl just wouldn't leave me alone. It was like we were diagramming a football play: The plan was, my one friend would walk by and get her attention, then my other friend would pretend to be drunk and stumble into her from behind and they would keep her occupied until I was out the door. It worked like a charm. Thank you, NFL." —Luke Somerville
Pet tricks
"A girl came up to me at a party once; she was cute, but all she talked about was herself, so I wanted to bail. I shuffled around in my pocket and made my phone go off by pressing the "ringer choice" button. Then I picked it up and said, loud enough for her to hear me, 'My parrot escaped?' I told her that my roommate called and that there was an emergency at home. I think she was too dumbfounded to argue, which gave me enough time to get out of there." —Johnny Sember
You snooze, you lose (your suitor, that is)
"A guy started to make a move on me at a bar, but after talking to him for about five minutes, I knew it was going nowhere. So, I pretended to fall asleep for a few seconds. When I 'woke up' I explained to him that I was just so tired and had had such a hard week. I'm not sure if he bought it, but after another few 'quick naps,' he moved on." —Jane Dryer
3 signs someone's trying to avoid you
Be a more aware dater: Understand the clues that someone just isn't that into you by heeding these signals.
- The person you're chatting up uses the word "but." For example: "I'd love to dance, but I've got two left feet." "I appreciate your offer for a drink, but I'm feeling under the weather." "I'd love to hang, but my friends and I might leave soon." Never take "but" statements at face value. If this person is interested in you, he or she will dance, drink, and stay for awhile—no ifs, ands, or buts.
- The object of your affection doesn't maintain eye contact. Even if this person is yakking up a storm with you and laughing at all your jokes—if the eyes are elsewhere, the mind is, too (most likely trying to figure out how to get unglued from you, sorry to say).
- He or she will answer your questions—but not make inquiries into your own life. Few people will be so rude as to ignore a question asked of them, but if they're not returning the volley with "so what about you?" or "what do you think?" that's because they want to cut the conversation short rather than keep it rolling. Stop wasting your breath and head to greener pastures.
@ 03:40 AM (32 months, 10 days ago)
Does Millard expect the country to feel sorry for her? In an interview with Barbara Walters today, she lamented about her presentation before the United Nations on her supposed writing capabilities.
She said "I'm the one who presented my blog to the world, and (it) will always be a part of my record. It was painful. (That's what everyone else says too). It is painful now." She goes on to comment "There were some people with intelligence who knew at the time that most of my postings were no good, and shouldn't be relied upon, and they didn't speak up. That devastated me."
If Millard was looking for a little sympathy, here's one place she won't find it. If she really wanted to do the right thing by this country, she would have shut up a long time ago. Yet she chooses to ignore the good soldiers, and in doing so, chose political expediency over the best interests of the country she claims to love so dearly.
In related news she did manage to bowl a 130 with the kids the other day.
http://www.standwithus.com/blog/index.php?id=9
@ 03:21 AM (32 months, 10 days ago)
Here's the original post.
Willy Wonka reports that the mysterious Blogger is Shalana Millard of Al Jezeera. Apparently, she was indeed at one of Bushie's press conferences. She's engaged to LOA over at Global War and had her red burka on, so she did not hear Bushie when he called on her. Shalana has all her shopping needs met at Hijabs-R-Us.


http://www.hijabs-r-us.com/
The real question, though, is WHY did Bush call on her? Had he been assured by Scottie Boy that Shalana was a defeatocrat plant, sure to ask the stupid questions?
@ 12:54 AM (32 months, 10 days ago)
2. Who i
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/12/28 @ 12:43 AM
This is about a 6 year old child who is no longer on this earth as a result of our "liberation" effort in Iraq. And this child's mother doesn't even know why U.S. forces were shooting, or who they were attempting to shoot at, when they killed her beloved son.
This is about the fact that George W. Bush admitted to Jim Lehrer that he never factored in the human cost of the war.
This is about the fact that the so-called "culture of life" neo-cons on the right really don't care about Americans, Iraqis, or any other human beings.
They care about their political agenda, and if a 6 year old child happens to be killed in the process, then as far as they are concerned, so be it.
Comment by SMillard— 2005/12/28 @ 12:53 AM
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/12/28 @ 01:23 AM
What kind of human being are you, anyway?
You have consistently shown a blatant disreguard for grieving mothers who have lost a child as a result of this war.
You are incapable of discussing the real issue at hand, and so you attempt to focus on something else that has nothing to do with the point of the article.
Nice try, but you should know by now that doesn't work on my blog. You stick to the issue at hand, which in this case happens to be about U.S. forces killing a 6 year old child for no reason.
Comment by SMillard— 2005/12/28 @ 02:36 AM